Bare-metal servers with AMD EPYC™ 9355 processor are now available in our UK location. Click here to order.

AlmaLinux vs Ubuntu vs CloudLinux: Best OS for cPanel Hosting 2026

  • Friday, January 2, 2026

 

Running cPanel & WHM on a solid Linux operating system is critical for performance and stability in web hosting. Since CentOS's discontinuation (formerly cPanel’s go-to OS), administrators often choose among AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, and CloudLinux for their cPanel servers. CPanel fully supports each of these OS options, but they differ in features, cost, and ideal use cases. In this post, we’ll compare AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, and CloudLinux on key factors – compatibility with cPanel, ease of use, performance, stability, support, licensing/cost, and everyday use cases – to determine which is the best overall choice for running cPanel.

Compatibility with cPanel

All three operating systems are officially compatible with the latest versions of cPanel & WHM. According to cPanel’s documentation, cPanel supports AlmaLinux (v8, v9, etc.), CloudLinux (v8, v9), and Ubuntu LTS releases (such as 22.04) as valid platforms. This means you can successfully install and run cPanel/WHM on any of these OS options.

AlmaLinux is a drop-in replacement for CentOS (the developers of CloudLinux created it after CentOS’s shift in direction). AlmaLinux inherited CentOS’s binary compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), which cPanel has long been built around. As a result, cPanel runs seamlessly on AlmaLinux, much like it did on CentOS. There’s even an official conversion tool (cPanel ELevate) to upgrade CentOS servers to AlmaLinux with cPanel, underlining that AlmaLinux is viewed as the natural successor in the cPanel ecosystem.

CloudLinux is a specialized, RHEL-based distribution built initially on CentOS, so it shares the same lineage. Not surprisingly, cPanel is fully compatible with CloudLinux as well. If you install cPanel on a server with a CloudLinux license, the installer will automatically convert the OS to CloudLinux. This tight integration indicates CloudLinux is recognized as a first-class platform for cPanel. Compatibility is not a concern – CloudLinux works hand-in-hand with cPanel/WHM, and many hosting providers deploy cPanel on CloudLinux for its extra benefits (discussed below).

Ubuntu support in cPanel is a relatively new development. Historically, cPanel only supported RHEL-based systems, but starting with cPanel version 102 (in 2022), Ubuntu LTS became fully supported. This was a significant expansion: cPanel’s VP of Product noted: “Ubuntu is a solid Linux distribution with a great track record of security and innovation. I’m really excited that cPanel & WHM are now available on this distro that is the first choice for many when they build a new application.”. In short, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS (and newer LTS versions going forward) are supported choices for cPanel servers. This gives users more flexibility – especially those who prefer Ubuntu’s ecosystem – without sacrificing official cPanel compatibility.

Ease of Use

From a day-to-day administration standpoint, ease of use is pretty similar across these OS options, but there are a few nuances:

  • AlmaLinux will feel familiar if you’ve managed CentOS or other RHEL-like systems. It uses yum/dnf package management and the same file system structure and SELinux policies as CentOS/RHEL. Since AlmaLinux is essentially “CentOS continued,” most cPanel administrators find it straightforward, with no special configuration beyond the standard cPanel setup. No additional licensing steps or custom repositories are required (unlike with CloudLinux). In other words, using AlmaLinux with cPanel is virtually identical to using CentOS with cPanel, which many admins have years of experience with.

  • CloudLinux is also based on the CentOS/RHEL family, so core OS management (commands, package manager, etc.) is the same as that of AlmaLinux. Installing cPanel on CloudLinux can be done by either converting an existing AlmaLinux/CentOS server to CloudLinux or by provisioning a new CloudLinux server from scratch. The added CloudLinux features do introduce extra management tools – for example, in WHM (WebHost Manager) you’ll have a LVE Manager interface to set resource limits for users, and commands like cldeploy or lveinfo to manage CloudLinux-specific settings. These tools are relatively user-friendly and integrate into cPanel/WHM’s GUI. There might be a short learning curve to using CloudLinux’s features (such as setting per-customer CPU/RAM limits or managing CageFS). Still, these are well-documented and designed for hosting providers’ convenience. Overall, if you’re comfortable with CentOS, CloudLinux doesn’t make administration harder – it just adds another layer of control inside cPanel/WHM. Many hosts include CloudLinux by default, so from an end-user perspective, it’s mostly transparent, aside from the benefits it provides.

  • Ubuntu is known for its user-friendliness in the Linux world, though primarily from a desktop perspective. On servers, Ubuntu’s ease of use comes from a large community and abundant how-to guides. It uses apt (apt-get) for package management, so cPanel’s installation on Ubuntu will pull in dependencies via apt instead of yum. If you’re used to Debian/Ubuntu systems, this is very straightforward. If you come from a CentOS background, the commands and paths on Ubuntu may differ slightly (for example, network interfaces or firewall tools might have different defaults). However, cPanel tries to abstract a lot of system management – it installs the needed packages and manages services through its own scripts regardless of the underlying distro. As long as you use an Ubuntu LTS server edition (not a minimal image missing critical components), cPanel installation and usage on Ubuntu should be smooth. Just note that Ubuntu’s ecosystem and directory structure have their own conventions; for instance, config files might be in different locations than on RHEL-based systems. The extensive Ubuntu community support can help if you run into any OS-specific questions, and Canonical’s documentation is very detailed. In summary, Ubuntu is relatively easy to use with cPanel – especially for administrators already familiar with it – but it’s a newer environment for cPanel, so some third-party cPanel scripts or guides (historically written for CentOS) might need minor adaptation.

In the cPanel/WHM interface, all three OS choices provide the same cPanel experience to the end user. The differences in ease of use primarily affect the server admin (package updates, command-line tasks, etc.). All have robust package managers and support automation. It’s worth noting that CloudLinux’s additional tools are integrated into WHM, making them easy to use via the web interface. Ubuntu’s advantage is that many users find its package management and upgrade process very straightforward and quick. Meanwhile, AlmaLinux/CloudLinux share the tried-and-true RHEL admin experience, which many hosting professionals are comfortable with.

Performance

In terms of raw performance, there is no significant difference among AlmaLinux, CloudLinux, and Ubuntu for typical cPanel operations. All three can efficiently run Apache/Nginx, PHP, MySQL, and email services, and handle high load if properly configured. However, a few distinctions are worth noting:

  • Baseline system performance: AlmaLinux and CloudLinux, being RHEL-based, are designed to be lightweight and efficient for enterprise server use. AlmaLinux has a minimal installation footprint and includes only what’s necessary for a server, making it very lean. Ubuntu Server is also relatively slim by default (especially with a minimal server install), though some sources report slightly higher system requirements for equivalent use cases. In practice, on modern hardware, these differences are minor – all three can run on 1-2 GB RAM minimum, and scale up to modern multi-core, high-memory machines as needed.

  • CloudLinux’s impact: CloudLinux’s unique value is not in boosting raw speed, but in ensuring consistent performance on shared servers. It uses a technology called Lightweight Virtual Environment (LVE) to allocate each cPanel user a set of resources (CPU, RAM, IO, etc.), so that a “noisy neighbor” site cannot hog all resources and slow down others. This means if one website on the server experiences a traffic spike or heavy load, CloudLinux will throttle it once it hits its limit, preventing the entire server from grinding to a halt. The result is a more stable performance across all hosted accounts. In essence, CloudLinux trades a small amount of overhead (for monitoring and enforcing limits) for improved overall server responsiveness. Most administrators find this trade-off well worth it – CloudLinux “smooths out” performance, so every site gets its fair share and no single account can cause lag for others. Additionally, CloudLinux includes a MySQL Governor to monitor database usage and PHP X-Ray tools to identify slow scripts, helping optimize site performance. For a single-tenant server or one with just a few sites, these features are less crucial. Still, on a busy multi-user server, CloudLinux can dramatically improve average performance by mitigating abuse and traffic spikes.

  • Kernel and updates: Both Ubuntu and CloudLinux offer live kernel patching (Ubuntu via Canonical Livepatch and CloudLinux via KernelCare). This means essential kernel security updates can be applied without rebooting, avoiding downtime. While this is more of a stability/uptime factor, it indirectly helps performance since you don’t need to schedule reboots that interrupt service. AlmaLinux does not include live kernel patching by default, but you can use third-party live patch services if required. In general, all three OSes receive regular upstream updates and performance improvements, and cPanel will apply relevant package updates via EasyApache, MySQL, and related components, regardless of OS.

In summary, all three OS can deliver strong performance for cPanel. AlmaLinux and Ubuntu are both capable of handling heavy web workloads (databases, applications, etc.), and CloudLinux adds tools to maintain consistent performance in a shared environment. If your server hosts many accounts or websites, CloudLinux can ensure that one user’s high load doesn’t slow down others, thereby maintaining consistent overall performance. If you’re running a single site or just a few sites, AlmaLinux and Ubuntu will perform just as well, and you likely won’t notice a difference in speed attributable solely to the OS.

Stability and Reliability

Stability is a paramount factor for servers, and each of these OS options has strengths here:

  • AlmaLinux is built for enterprise-grade stability. It tracks RHEL releases exactly, which means it undergoes rigorous testing and has a 10-year support lifecycle for each major version. AlmaLinux’s focus is on being a 1:1 RHEL clone, so it inherits RHEL’s reliability, long-term support (LTS), and slow, well-vetted updates. This makes it highly predictable. In fact, some analyses suggest AlmaLinux might have a slight edge in predictability and consistency compared to Ubuntu, simply because RHEL (and thus Alma) emphasizes stability over introducing new features. For businesses that ran CentOS for years without issues, AlmaLinux offers the same rock-solid foundation. It’s considered “versatile, reliable and, being open-source, entirely free” – an ideal CentOS replacement.

  • CloudLinux builds on the stable RHEL/CentOS base and optimizes it for hosting stability. By isolating each user with CageFS and LVE, CloudLinux prevents many common stability issues in shared hosting. For example, a buggy script or malware on one account can’t easily crash the whole server or affect other users – it’s contained within that user’s cage (virtual environment). This dramatically improves overall uptime and reliability on crowded servers. CloudLinux also enables safe updates: its ability to perform kernel upgrades without reboots lets you apply security patches immediately, without leaving the server vulnerable or scheduling downtime. In terms of vendor support, CloudLinux (the company) provides timely patches and has a track record of rapidly releasing updates (often in parallel with RHEL’s). For hosting providers, CloudLinux’s approach to stability through resource control has proven effective – it “prevents the intensive operations of one website from affecting the performance of others”. This isolation means the server as a whole remains stable even under stress. It’s no surprise that many high-uptime hosting services rely on CloudLinux to meet their SLAs for stability.

  • Ubuntu is also a stable choice, especially if using its LTS (Long-Term Support) versions. Ubuntu LTS releases are released every two years and are supported for at least 5 years, including security updates. Canonical is known for quickly issuing patches and keeping the system secure. One advantage is that Ubuntu often has newer packages and hardware support, making it more suitable for cutting-edge environments or newer server hardware (where drivers and software might be more up to date). The trade-off is that Ubuntu’s support horizon (5 years, or 10 with Ubuntu Pro) is shorter than AlmaLinux’s (10 years) for a given release. Some enterprise users find AlmaLinux’s longer lifecycle more predictable for long-term deployments, whereas others are comfortable upgrading Ubuntu to the next LTS every few years. In terms of reliability, Ubuntu’s large user base means any stability issues are usually caught and discussed openly. It also adheres to a strict release schedule and tests thoroughly, but it introduces more frequent version upgrades (which can be seen as a chance for new bugs or needed adjustments). Still, within the scope of an LTS release, Ubuntu is very stable and many companies run mission-critical applications on it.

It’s worth noting that cPanel itself supports these OS versions throughout their life. For example, cPanel will support AlmaLinux 8 or CloudLinux 8 until their upstream end-of-life in 2029, and AlmaLinux 9 or CloudLinux 9 well into the 2030s, according to cPanel’s EOL policies. This means you won’t be forced to change the OS for stability reasons anytime soon after deploying it. Ubuntu 22.04 LTS will similarly be supported by cPanel for its 5-year life (with plans to support newer LTS releases as they come). Regarding kernel crashes or critical bugs, none of these OSes have known issues when running cPanel; they are all considered stable platforms for web hosting. Ultimately, CloudLinux provides the highest stability for shared hosting scenarios (by isolating failures). At the same time, AlmaLinux and Ubuntu both offer a very stable core OS suitable for cPanel with long-term updates and security fixes.

Support and Community

Support can refer to both community/vendor assistance and the availability of updates or help when issues arise:

  • AlmaLinux has a growing and enthusiastic community support structure. It’s backed by the non-profit AlmaLinux OS Foundation, which includes members from CloudLinux and other companies. There are official forums, Mattermost and IRC channels, a Reddit community, and comprehensive documentation available for AlmaLinux. Because it’s binary-compatible with RHEL, AlmaLinux can also draw on solutions from the CentOS/RHEL knowledge base; fixes or configurations are often identical. While AlmaLinux does not have a single commercial entity selling support subscriptions (unlike RHEL or Ubuntu), many server management companies or hosting providers are familiar with it and can support it. The community has been very active since AlmaLinux’s launch in 2021, ensuring that issues are promptly addressed and guides are available. Regular updates and security patches are released in sync with RHEL, so you get enterprise-grade maintenance for free. In summary, AlmaLinux relies on the community and the broader RHEL ecosystem for support, which works well for most users. If professional support is needed, one could use general Linux admins or third-party support providers, as AlmaLinux is relatively standard in its behavior.

  • CloudLinux includes professional support from CloudLinux (TuxCare). When you pay for a CloudLinux license, you also gain access to their support channels. This can be a big plus if you run into an OS-level issue – you have a vendor to turn to. The CloudLinux team also maintains detailed documentation and a knowledge base for its product. Since CloudLinux is aimed at web hosting companies, its support engineers are accustomed to cPanel-related environments. Additionally, CloudLinux users benefit from the broader web hosting community (e.g., WebHostingTalk forums), where many admins share best practices for CloudLinux configurations. CloudLinux often releases timely patches or custom fixes to enhance hosting security (e.g., HardenedPHP for older PHP versions), demonstrating a proactive approach to support. The downside, of course, is that support is tied to the paid license. But given that CloudLinux’s customer base is essentially businesses, this vendor support can be very reassuring. Essentially, with CloudLinux, you get an extra layer of support beyond what cPanel provides – you can contact cPanel for control panel issues and CloudLinux for OS-level issues. Both together cover your needs. It’s also worth noting that CloudLinux’s developers were the ones who initiated AlmaLinux, so in a sense, they contribute to that community as well. But for direct one-on-one support, CloudLinux (the product) is the best option.

  • Ubuntu has one of the largest and most active communities in the Linux world. Ubuntu Server documentation is comprehensive, and many tutorials cover everyday tasks. Canonical (Ubuntu’s company) also offers commercial support and Ubuntu Pro subscriptions for enterprises that need guaranteed help or extended security fixes. Ubuntu provides a dual option: a massive free community knowledge pool and an optional paid support model. This is attractive to many businesses: you can run Ubuntu at no cost and rely on community support, or, if your organization requires SLAs, opt into Canonical’s support. Since Ubuntu on cPanel is newer, community discussions about cPanel on Ubuntu are still catching up to the volume of CentOS discussions. However, the general Linux guidance often applies across distributions. Also, cPanel’s support will assist with Ubuntu issues, as it would with AlmaLinux or CloudLinux, provided the issue falls within the supported scope. Canonical’s long-term commitment to security (with features like Ubuntu Livepatch and 10-year security maintenance for those who need it) means you can trust that Ubuntu won’t be left behind in terms of updates.

cPanel’s support: Regardless of OS, if you have a cPanel license with support, the cPanel team will help troubleshoot your cPanel/WHM issues on that OS. They maintain documentation for each supported OS and note any distro-specific caveats in their knowledge base. For example, cPanel notes that using “Ubuntu minimal” installer images can cause issues due to missing packages and recommends a standard installation for smooth operation. They also provide guides on converting from CentOS to AlmaLinux or CloudLinux (via ELevate), reflecting their support focus on these platforms.

Overall, support is strong for all three: AlmaLinux has a rapidly growing community and RHEL compatibility; CloudLinux offers commercial support tailored to hosting providers; and Ubuntu has a vast community and Canonical’s backing. If having a vendor to call is critical for you, CloudLinux (and optionally Ubuntu with a support contract) has an edge. If you’re comfortable with community-driven support, both AlmaLinux and Ubuntu excel in this area.

Licensing and Cost

One of the clearest differences between these OS options is cost:

  • AlmaLinux is entirely free and open-source. There are no licensing fees to use AlmaLinux on your server. This is a big attraction, as it fills the gap left by CentOS’s free offering. You can install AlmaLinux on any number of servers at no cost. Sponsors support the AlmaLinux Foundation, but end-users pay nothing. This makes AlmaLinux very cost-effective for running cPanel, especially since cPanel/WHM is a licensed product; using a free OS helps keep overall costs down.

  • Ubuntu is also a free and open-source operating system. Downloading and installing Ubuntu Server costs nothing. There is no mandatory license fee for using Ubuntu with cPanel. Canonical offers paid services (such as Ubuntu Pro or Advantage for support and additional security patch years), but these are optional. Most users running cPanel on Ubuntu will be fine with the free LTS and its 5-year support window. Using Ubuntu doesn’t incur any additional cost beyond your usual server expenses. From a licensing standpoint, Ubuntu’s terms permit unrestricted use in commercial settings without requiring any further agreements.

  • CloudLinux, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires a per-server license. The cost can vary by volume or provider, but it typically ranges from USD $15 per month per server (often in the $12–$18 retail range, with some discounts for bulk or annual payments). Hosting providers sometimes get volume pricing (the snippet suggests $4 to $18, likely reflecting heavy bulk discounts vs. retail). In practice, if you sign up with CloudLinux directly, you'll pay a monthly fee for each cPanel server running CloudLinux. The license grants you access to updates, support, and all CloudLinux features. But if you are the server owner, you’ll need to budget for the CloudLinux license. It’s an extra cost in exchange for the benefits (LVE, CageFS, etc.).

In summary, AlmaLinux and Ubuntu are free, whereas CloudLinux incurs an ongoing licensing fee. If you’re on a tight budget or running a small operation, avoiding that extra ~$15/month by choosing AlmaLinux or Ubuntu can be significant. However, if the features of CloudLinux add value to your business (e.g., enabling you to safely host more accounts on a single server, which can, in turn, increase revenue), its cost might be justifiable. Many shared hosting providers consider CloudLinux’s licensing fee part of the cost of doing business when offering a higher quality of service. For a single enterprise running only its own sites on a single server, CloudLinux might be unnecessary, making AlmaLinux or Ubuntu more cost-effective.

It’s also worth noting that the cPanel license itself is a cost factor (regardless of OS, you need a cPanel license per server), but that is outside the scope of the OS comparison. All three OS support the same cPanel license types.

Common Use Cases in Web Hosting

Each OS has carved out a niche in the web hosting world. Here are the common scenarios where one might be preferred over the others:

  • AlmaLinux – General-Purpose Hosting: AlmaLinux is often the top choice for VPS, dedicated, and cloud servers running cPanel for a broad range of use cases. If you were previously using CentOS on a cPanel server, AlmaLinux is a straightforward successor for web hosting, email servers, databases, and other services. It’s an excellent default for most cPanel installations where you want a stable, enterprise Linux without extra bells and whistles. Typical use cases include hosting a company’s websites and applications, multi-site WordPress hosting, reseller hosting nodes, and similar scenarios where the admin wants a reliable OS and doesn’t need specialized isolation features. AlmaLinux is also popular for managed VPS and dedicated server plans offered by hosting providers – in those environments, customers get a cPanel server on AlmaLinux because it’s stable and free, keeping costs low. In short, AlmaLinux is a versatile OS that can handle anything from a single busy e-commerce site to hundreds of moderate sites on a server. It’s especially ideal if you value a “forever-free, enterprise-grade” platform with CentOS-like behavior.

  • CloudLinux – Shared Hosting Environments: CloudLinux is purpose-built for shared hosting providers and for scenarios where a single server hosts multiple unrelated customers. If you run a cPanel server that sells shared hosting accounts or cPanel reseller accounts, CloudLinux is usually considered the gold standard OS. The reason is its ability to deliver consistent performance and enhanced security in multi-tenant situations. Typical use cases: web hosting companies deploy CloudLinux on their cPanel servers, which might host hundreds of client websites. By doing so, they ensure that a single client’s traffic surge or a hacked script can’t destabilize the entire server. Each client lives in a CageFS “cage” with set resource limits (via LVE). For example, companies like eukhost use CloudLinux on all their shared hosting plans to guarantee uptime, while offering AlmaLinux as an option on VPS/dedicated plans. Reseller hosting platforms also benefit from CloudLinux, which enables hosts to allocate resources to each reseller’s cPanel accounts securely. Even if you run a single organization’s multiple websites on one server, CloudLinux can be helpful if those sites have varying loads – it will wall them off from each other for safety. Additionally, any host that wants to offer customers a choice of PHP versions or needs to support legacy PHP for specific clients can use CloudLinux’s HardenedPHP and PHP Selector features. Overall, CloudLinux is the ideal choice when maximizing uptime, security, and fairness on a busy server is a priority. It shines in shared hosting, but it’s arguably unnecessary for a dedicated server running a single application (in that case, AlmaLinux would suffice).

  • Ubuntu – Developer-Centric and Specialized Use: Ubuntu is a newcomer to cPanel hosting, but it’s quickly finding its place. A typical use case for Ubuntu with cPanel is when the server owner or admin team already has experience with Ubuntu/Debian environments. For instance, some DevOps teams that deploy applications on Ubuntu (for its up-to-date packages or compatibility with specific software) might prefer to standardize and also run cPanel on Ubuntu. We often see agencies or SaaS providers use Ubuntu for their stacks – now if they want to add a cPanel server (perhaps to manage client sites or email), they can stick with Ubuntu to match their workflow. Ubuntu is also a strong choice for cloud deployments; many cloud marketplace images and automation scripts are Ubuntu-first. If you use containerization or specific newer technologies alongside cPanel, Ubuntu may have the edge in package availability. That said, Ubuntu’s use in cPanel hosting is currently smaller than that of Alma/CloudLinux. You might choose Ubuntu for a cPanel server if you find it easier, or if you need packages from Ubuntu’s repositories. But in general, hosts still prefer RHEL-based systems for cPanel. One emerging scenario is WordPress hosting on Ubuntu, since some tools (such as LXD containers or specific optimizations) are Ubuntu-friendly, a host might combine them with cPanel. In summary, Ubuntu with cPanel is perfectly viable for general web hosting (just like AlmaLinux) and may be preferred by those who value Ubuntu’s ecosystem or require its specific features. It may also be a good choice for a single-site server (like hosting a large website or application) where you want the latest software and don’t require account isolation. As cPanel’s collaboration with Ubuntu indicates, it’s aimed at giving customers greater diversity and “help customers scale and expand their business hosting operations” by leveraging Ubuntu’s popularity.

Conclusion: Which OS is Best for cPanel?

After weighing compatibility, ease of use, performance, stability, support, cost, and everyday use cases, our overall recommendation for most cPanel deployments is AlmaLinux. AlmaLinux provides an ideal balance of enterprise-grade stability, full cPanel compatibility, and zero licensing cost – making it a cost-effective choice without sacrificing reliability. It’s essentially the continuation of the trusted CentOS formula, which means it’s tried-and-true for running cPanel and web hosting stacks. For general-purpose servers (from small business websites to large multi-site hosting), AlmaLinux offers predictability and an extended support lifecycle, ensuring your cPanel server stays secure and supported for years. In the words of one hosting provider, AlmaLinux is “versatile, reliable and, being open-source, entirely free,” which suits VPS, dedicated, and cloud servers perfectly.

That said, the “best” OS can depend on your specific scenario. If you run a busy shared hosting server with many customers, CloudLinux might be the best choice despite its licensing costs. CloudLinux’s features provide superior control over resource usage and security isolation, leading to happier customers in a shared environment. It’s an ideal choice for those providing hosting as a service, where the investment in CloudLinux yields dividends in uptime and support savings (by preventing issues). Many experts consider CloudLinux indispensable for large-scale shared hosting. However, for a single organization or smaller host, those features might be overkill – if you don’t need them, why pay extra? In such cases, AlmaLinux would be preferable.

As for Ubuntu, it is a strong alternative and has proven itself as a stable server OS, now with cPanel’s blessing and support. If your team is Ubuntu-savvy or your use cases align with Ubuntu’s ecosystem, you won’t be wrong to choose it. Ubuntu brings the benefit of a huge community and up-to-date software, and cPanel’s move to support it acknowledges its popularity (Ubuntu is one of the most widely used Linux distributions, powering nearly 50% of Linux web servers by some surveys). Still, considering cPanel’s legacy and the hosting industry’s patterns, AlmaLinux currently edges out Ubuntu for cPanel in overall suitability – mainly due to its RHEL heritage and the comfort level the cPanel community has with that environment. Ubuntu is catching up fast, but AlmaLinux enjoys the advantage of being purpose-built as a CentOS replacement for cPanel users.

In conclusion, for most users, we recommend AlmaLinux as the best all-around OS for cPanel. It offers compatibility, stability, and performance on par with enterprise Linux, without any added cost or complexity. Choose AlmaLinux if you want a no-nonsense, proven platform to host cPanel. If you run a large shared hosting server or require strict resource isolation, CloudLinux is the best specialized option. It’s essentially AlmaLinux plus premium hosting features, which can be worth it in that context. If you prefer Ubuntu or have specific requirements it fulfills, Ubuntu LTS with cPanel is a reliable choice. It may be the best option for teams already invested in the Ubuntu ecosystem. All three OS can run cPanel effectively; it’s about matching the OS strengths to your particular use case. By considering the factors above – compatibility, ease of management, performance consistency, support options, and cost – you can confidently select the OS that will keep your cPanel hosting environment running smoothly for the long haul.

« Back